Question: Could I beat Usain Bolt over 100 metres, if he ran and I biked?

First thoughts: it might be possible, but I need to do some calculations to get an idea of whether it’s feasible or not.

To win the Olympic Gold on Sunday, Bolt ran 100 metres in 9.63 seconds. That’s an average speed of 10.37m/s. The first thing one needs to figure out is: can I bike that fast? Because if I can’t even match his *average* speed, then I clearly can’t beat him. The speed 10.37m/s is equivalent to 37.34km/h (23.2mph): I can certainly ride faster than that over short distances; I might be able to manage 50km/h (31mph) at a stretch. So, as the MythBusters say, we are at the ‘Plausible’ stage thus far.

The key to this will be to attain top speed as quickly as possible. I can certainly bike faster than Usain Bolt can run *but only once I’ve reached top speed*.

Let’s assume a simple mathematical model for this task. For calculation purposes, consider the 100m race split into two sections:

- Accelerate smoothly from stationary to top speed, and then
- Continue at that top speed until the end of the race.

It’s probably a reasonable model for cycling over a short distance. With this model, we must make two assumptions to plug into our model:

- What is my top speed? (let’s call this
*V_max*for “Velocity-max”) - How quickly can I reach that top speed? (let’s call this
*T_accel*for “Time to accelerate to max velocity”)

Calculating one’s finishing time for 100 metres based on the above model works as follows. Ignore this bit and skip to the table below if aren’t interested in the method and just want to see the results:

- Given
*T_accel*, one must calculate the distance over which the acceleration takes place. This is calculated as*(V_max*T_accel)/2*– let’s call that distance*D_accel* - Assuming that we finish accelerating before we reach 100m, we then work out how long we take to finish the remaining
*100-D_accel*metres, riding at our top speed of*V_max*. Let’s call that time*T_steady*, beecause it’s the time we spend at our steady top speed:*T_steady = (100-D_accel)/V_max* - Our finishing 100m time
*T_finish*is therefore:*T_accel+T_steady*

To make everything work properly, units of measurement must be consistent. Times must be measured in seconds, distances in metres and speeds in metres per second. Conversion between “metres per second” and “kilometres per hour” is very simple: one metre per second is 3600 metres per hour, i.e. 3.6km per hour. Let’s try running the numbers with *V_max* speeds of 12m/s, 13m/s and 14m/s (equivalent to 43.2km/h, 46.8km/h and 50.4km/h). What about acceleration times? I’m less sure of suitable values here, but let’s try 5 seconds, 7 seconds and 10 seconds.

Top speed: | 12 m/s | 13 m/s | 14 m/s |
---|---|---|---|

Acceleration time: | |||

10 seconds | 13.33 | 12.69 | 12.14 |

7 seconds | 11.83 | 11.19 | 10.64 |

5 seconds | 10.83 | 10.19 | 9.64 |

Aha! If I can get my speed up to 14m/s (50.4km/h or 31.3mph) in five seconds and hold that speed, I can finish in 9.64 seconds, just 0.01s behind Usain Bolt, based on Sunday’s performance!

Is that possible, could I do that? It sounds like an awfully tall order. I can beat Bolt if I can go faster or accelerate quicker than above, of course, but realistically I think that’s beyond my capabilities.

If *I* can’t do it, what about real cycling professionals? Let’s apply the same sort of mathematical model to the recent Velodrome cycling at the Olympics, I see some sprint cyclists recorded “first lap” times of just over 17 seconds. This is a distance of 250 metres from a standing start. If one assumes a smooth acceleration over the entire lap I calculate that these cyclists pass 100 metres at around **10.7 seconds** (detailed calculations available on request) – Bolt still wins. However, if the cyclist achieves top speed much earlier in the lap, they will reach 100m sooner. Jason Kenny completed his gold-medal-winning sprint final 200m (not quite a full lap), presumably at his absolute top speed, in around 10 seconds: this is an incredibly quick 20m/s (72km/h or 45mph!). So how quickly would he be able to complete 100m, from a standing start? Assuming a top speed of 20m/s, to reproduce the 17 second first lap time, this would be a 9-second acceleration (covering 90m in that time) and a further 8.0 seconds to cover the remaining 160m at 20m/s; as a side-effect that shows us that such a cyclist would cover 100m in approximately **9.50 seconds**. This beats Bolt!

To answer my own question: could *I* beat Usain Bolt over 100m on my bike? **No.** Not a chance.

Further question: could *any* cyclist beat Usain Bolt over 100m? **Possibly, just**, although it might be very close.

I wonder how fast I could actually bike 100 metres, though, from a standing start? I think I should try timing it…

And of course it goes without saying that I’d be able to beat the sprinters over *200m*, because I’d be up to top speed for longer

Arent track cyclists hindered in the start by the single stupidly hight gear? Perhaps Bradley Wiggins on a decent tdf boke with a few gears would be better?

@Martin: “fixed gear” v “multiple gears” is interesting. Multiple gears would probably help acceleration in themselves, but there’d be a time cost associated with gear changes: don’t know how that would overall affect things…

I think Wiggins would be quicker on a track bike over 100m than road or TT bike

As for the gearing. I think pursuit bikes have a long gear because once they get up to speed it’s about being smooth and sprint bikes a shorter gear (thinking sprint rather than team sprint which is probably longer geared especially the last guy) because it’s all about reactions and leg speed.

Saying that short and long are relative terms here I’ve ridden a sprint bike on the track and it was bloody hard work to get moving

Also different riders would have gearing I bet Hoy and Bauge have an extra couple of teeth of the front ring compared to Kenny who has quicker legs to compensate.

Couldn’t see how fast the Dura-Ace electronic shift is but think shifting is just going to be slower.

The above comments pretty much reflect my own thought process (as I cycled to work this morning at considerably less than 30 mph….). My guess would be that for a 100m only race, you’d gear the bike lower than for 200m, and spin faster. You don’t need to maintain the full speed rotation for as long, but hitting a higher speed quicker is much more important – you can sacrifice top speed and long-term stamina for pure acceleration.

So does anyone have phone numbers for Chris Hoy and Usain Bolt to help us set up a race?

Now that I think about it, the other thing worth noting is that the equipment used in the Olympics is strictly governed by the UCI, and may not actually be the most efficient over 100m. (eg Graham Obree had a couple of designs rejected IIRC)